Friday, Feb. 13, 2015

Before we get started here's a compilation of typical values of atmospheric electrical parameters at different altitudes.  It's based on a handout that Dr. Krider used to hand out in his classes.

In this lecture we'll finish up the discussion of small ions and small ion balance equations.  Last class we left with a small ion balance equation that contained ionization rate (production) and recombination rate (loss) terms.



Today we will add two additional small ion loss terms.  A small ion can attach to an uncharged particle, creating a charged particle or a so-called "large ion". 




Or a small ion of one polarity can attach to a charged particle of the opposite polarity creating an uncharged particle (provided the small ion and the particle have equal quantities of charge).  These two new terms are included in the small ion balance equation below.  The β+o and β+- terms are referred to as "attachment coefficients."



We often assume that the concentrations of positive and negative small ions and the concentrations of positively and negatively charged particles are equal.  Let's also make the following assumptions concerning the attachment coefficients.

The balance equation then becomes

The bottom equation is just an additional simplification of the top equation.  A total particle concentration term, Z, is used rather than keeping track of the concentrations of charged and uncharged particles.  This is the form of the equation we'll use in most situations.

The figure below (from The Earth's Electrical Environment reference) illustrates how ion-particle attachment begins to significantly reduce small ion concentrations beginning at particles concentrations of about 1000 cm
-3.  Clean air typically has 100s of particles per cc while dirtier air would contain 1000s of particles per cc.


You might remember the research vessel Carnegie mentioned near the start of the semester.  In addition to measurements of electric field (the Carnegie curve) measurements of atmospheric conductivity were also made.  The instrumentation has changed little since then.  Atmospheric conductivity depends on the concentration of small ions which we now see is  affected by particle concentrations.  There is no question that increased combustion of fossil fuels have increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations; there is concern that this might cause global warming.  You might also expect combustion to add particles to the atmosphere.  Thus a comparison of atmospheric conductivity made in the early 1900s with measurements made today might provide some indication of whether atmospheric particulate concentrations have changed.  Atmospheric conductivity measurements might be another example of proxy data that might be used to track climate change.



We will spend some time considering what fraction of particles are uncharged and charged.  We'll start with a large ion (charged particle) balance equation.



N in this equation can represent the concentration of either positively or negatively charged particles.  Large ions are created when a small ion attaches to an uncharged particle.  They are destroyed when a small ion attaches to a charged particle of the opposite polarity .

Under steady state conditions



Now we'll look at the fraction of large and small particles that are uncharged. 




In some supplementary notes we look at how a relatively straight forward solution to the diffusion equation can be used to derive an expression for  β0.  You can then consider the additional flux of small ions to a charged particle (diffusion plus the effect of the electric field created by the charged particle).  That gives an expression for  β1 .  For larger particles we find that   β0 = β1  .



For larger particles you would expect to find equal numbers of positively charged, negatively charged, and non-charged particles.

For smaller particles the agreement between predictions and measurements of the uncharged fraction (No/Z) is not very good.




Because of this poor agreement we did not spend any class time working through the details of the diffusion theory approach to estimating particle attachment coefficients.  The details are in the supplementary reading though if you are interested.


We will have a more careful look at an alternate approach that uses Boltzmann statistics.


A charged particle has a certain amount of "stored" energy associated with it.  Thus we can use the Boltzmann distribution above to predict the distribution of charged particles (the particles can carry only integral multiples of an electronic charge, i.e. Q = me, where m is an integer and e is the charge on an electron).

The energy stored on a charged sphere is (the details of the derivation are in a second set of supplementary notes)

We can insert this expression into the Boltzmann distribution equation above.


A temperature of 300 K was assumed in the calculation above.  Also in class I used 0.028 μm in the parentheses instead of 2.8 x 10 -6 cm. The exponential starts to become pretty small for particles with radii less that 2.8 x 10-6 cm, less than 0.028 μm  (especially if m > 1, that is the particle has more than one electronic charge).  So we can see that most small particles will be uncharged.  Those that are charged will mostly just carry 1 electronic charge.  For example



Now we can compare predictions of the uncharged fraction of particles with measurements.  Here are the details of the predicted value for a particle with radius = 10-6 cm.

This agrees much better with the measured value.  The table shown earlier is reproduced below.  This time Boltzmann statistics are used to predict the uncharged fraction.


The agreement between measured and predicted values is much better.  Again, if the table had been extended to larger particles, we would expect the predicted No/Z to approach 0.33.


Next week we will begin to look at thundercloud electrification processes.  Here's some supplementary reading that will provide some background information.