Wednesday Feb. 4, 2015

The first homework assignment was returned today.  I'll try to get a set of solution online before the end of the week.

The 2nd Homework Assignment is due next Monday.


Today we'll mostly leave electric field, electrostatic potential and that sort of thing behind for a few lectures and concentrate more on air conductivity and currents in the atmosphere.  The first figure below is a recap of what we covered earlier in the course (the first day of class).


Currents in the atmosphere and in a wire are compared at the top of the figure.  A battery drives a current through a wire and resistor in the picture at right.  Free electrons alone transport the current. 

In the atmosphere, at left, we normally speak of a current density (Amps/square meter) rather than current.  Positive and negatively charged "small ions" move in opposite directions in response to an electric field and carry the weak currents that flow through air. 
We'll refer to this as a conduction current. 

The small ions are created when ionizing radiation of some kind strips an electron from an N2 or O2 molecule leaving behind positively charged
N2 or O2.  The electrons then rapidly attach to O2 creating a negatively charged O2 molecule (they don't attach to N2).  The charged nitrogen and oxygen molecules are then surrounded by water vapor molecules.  Note that because of the structure of the water molecule, the positively charged small ions end up with more H2O molecules surrounding them and are slightly less mobile. We'll look at the creation of small ions in more detail in a later lecture.


The electrical mobility is a measure of how readily or quickly charge carriers will move in an electric field.  The drift velocity is simply the electrical mobility multiplied by the strength of the electric field. 



Typical values of Be and drift velocity are shown above.  These drift velocities are much smaller than the random thermal motions of atoms and molecules in air (typically 100s of meters per second). 

Wind motions (typically a few or a few 10s of meters per second) can also potentially transport charge, but for this to occur there must be a gradient is space charge density.  These would be referred to as convection currents.


Next we'll see what the current density J is comprised of.



Here we consider N charge carriers per unit volume (each with charge q) moving in the same direction and derive an expression for J the current density.  ΔQ is the charge in the cylinder above that will pass through dA in time
Δt.


We will only concern ourselves with conduction currents that are linearly proportional to the electric field. 


This is known as Ohm's law and the constant of proportionality is the conductivity. 


We can use
our newly derived expression for current density together with the definition of electrical mobility to obtain an expression for conductivity. 





Let's go back to the earlier diagram where we determined the expression for J.  In air we will generally need to sum contributions from charge carriers of two polarities: +q moving in one direction and oppositely charged carriers (-q) moving in the opposite direction.



We've assumed that the number density of positive and negative charge carriers is the same and that the charge carriers carry the same charge and move at the same speed.

The expression for conductivity would also need to include both positive and negative charge carriers.  The earlier expression would have two terms:



We've made allowance for the fact that negatively charged small ions generally have slightly higher electrical mobility than positively charged small ions.  Often we will assume that the mobilities and concentrations of positive and negative charge carriers are equal in which case the conductivity would just be 2 N q Be.



A note about conductivity units.  This wasn't mentioned in class.


Conductivity has units of 1/(ohms m).  In some older literature you may find this written as mhos/m (mhos is ohms spelled backwards) though Siemens/m are now the officially adopted units.


Resistivity is the reciprocal of conductivity.  Resistivity is not the same as resistance, but it is easy to relate the two.



I've just left λ (conductivity) in the work above to avoid any confusion between the symbols for resistance and resistivity.



Here's the relationship between resistance and resistivity

Resistivities of some common materials are listed below (conductivity is shown in the case of air)

Note how the conductivity of air is a function of air temperature.  A lightning return stroke will heat air to a peak temperature of about 30,000 K for a short time.

Later in the semester we will look at some fast time resolved measurements of lightning electric fields that were being used to try to determine characteristics of the fast time varying currents in lightning strokes.  The measurements were made in a location where propagation between the lightning source and E field antenna was over salt water to preserve as much of the high frequency content of the signals as possible.


The next item in class today was to derive a continuity equation that relates changes in the space charge density in a volume to net flow of charge into or out of the volume.


Starting at upper left, the charge, Q, contained in the volume is just the volume integral of the volume space charge density.  A positive value for the surface integral of J at upper right would mean net transport of charge out of the volume.  This would reduce the total charge in the volume and dQ/dt would be negative.

We use the divergence theorem to write the surface integral of J as a volume integral of the divergence of J.  Then the two volume integrals are set equal to each other.  The only way the two integrals can be equal for an arbitrary volume is if the integrands themselves are equal.  We end up with the continuity equation in the middle of the figure.

In this class we'll often assume steady state conditions

and that J has just a z component.  In that case the divergence of J is zero and Jz is constant with altitude. 


Finally we go back to something we considered on the first day of the course



A small portion of the earth's negatively charged surface is shown above.  The area shown contains a total charge Qo.


How quickly will the flow of current shown above to neutralize all the charge on the earth's surface.   J depends on E.  We consider the earth's surface to be a perfect conductor so we can write E in terms of the surface charge density.  J is proportional to the charge on the earth's surface.  So as Q on the surface is neutralized Jz will weaken



The first equation above shows how Q will change as current flows to the ground.  The produce (J A) is just current I (Coulombs/second); multiplying by t gives the charge transported to the surface (Coulombs) during time t.

We find that the Q on the surface will decay exponentially from its initial value Qo

If we insert reasonable values for εo and λ we obtain

This is the time for the charge on the surface to decrease to 1/e of its original value, not the time needed to neutralize it completely and is comparable to what we determined early in the semester.