Monday Feb. 2, 2015



The following handout gives a rough, back-of-the-envelope kind of estimate of the factor of enhancement.


This might require a little explanation.


First you write down the potential at the surface of two conducting spheres of radius a and b, carrying charges Q and q (really just the potential a distance a or b from a point charge Q or q)




Then you connect the two spheres with a wire which forces the two potentials to be equal (this would of course cause the charge to rearrange themselves and turn this into a much more complex problem, but we will ignore that).



Finally we write down expressions for the relative strengths of the electric fields at the surfaces of the two spheres (we assume Q and q would be uniformly spread out over the two spheres which wouldn't be true).  We see that the field at the surface of the smaller sphere is a/b times larger than the field at the surface of the bigger sphere.


Here is a real example of field enhancement that lead to triggering of a lightning strike and subsequent loss of a launch vehicle (you'll find the entire article here)



In this case the rocket body together with the exhaust plume created a long pointed conducting object.  Enhanced fields at the top and bottom triggered lightning.






Lightning also strikes aircraft.  Here's an example.  Often the discharge is initiated by the airplane.


We'll talk about triggered lightning later in the course.  I'm referring to lightning that is purposely trigger so that it can strike instrumentation on the ground and studied at close range.


The basic idea is to launch a small rocket (about 3 feet tall) in a high electric field under a thunderstorm.  A spool of wire is mounted on the tail fins of the rocket.  One end of the wire is connected to ground and the other end runs up to the nose of the rocket.  Wire un-spools (probably the hardest part is to keep the wire from breaking) once the rocket is launched forming a narrow tall conducting object.  Field enhancement at the top of the rocket is enough often times to initiate an upward leader discharge that then triggers lightning.

An example from the ICLRT (International Center for Lightning Research and Testing) operated by the University of  Florida.

Enhancement of the E field at the top of a mountain (or tall building or structure) is sometimes high enough to trigger lightning also.


Note the direction of the branching.  This indicates that this discharge began with a leader process that traveled upward from the mountain.  Most cloud to ground lightning discharges begin with a leader that propagates from the cloud downward toward the ground.  We will of course look at the events that occur during lightning discharges in a lot more detail later in the semester.  Here are some examples filmed in Germany (probably developing off tall towers of some kind) and strikes to the Empire State Building.

And finally the ability of a point to draw off or throw off electrical charged that so interested Benjamin Franklin involves enhancement of the E field.


A pointed conductor brought near a Van de Graaff generator enhances the field enough to ionize air and create charge carries in the air.  A weak current flows between the Van de Graaff and the point.  Charge on the generator is not able to build to the point where a large bright spark occurs.



Here's an example of a very cleverly designed instrument that has been used to measure electric fields above the ground and inside thunderstorms (you can download the complete Winn et al. 1978 publication here). 



Two metal spheres are attached to and spin vertically around a horizontal shaft (the shaft also spins azimuthally).  The instrument is launched under a thunderstorm and is carried upward by balloon. 

As the spheres spin, a current will move back and forth between them.  The amplitude of the current will depend on the charge induced on the spheres by the electric field.  The induced charge will, in turn, depend on the intensity of the E field.
Determining how the two conducting spheres will enhance the electric field is a more complex problem than we considered in the last lecture but it has been worked out analytically (don't worry we won't be looking at the details).  You could also work it out numerically or determine the enhancement experimentally.  Note that the two spheres also act an antenna for transmitting data back to the ground.

The next figure shows an example of data obtained with an instrument like this (it is from a different publication which you can download here, but a similar instrument was used).


We're going to take a more careful look at 2 or 3 parts of the E field plot.  First the small highlighted portion at the bottom of the plot.  Here the sensor was below the lowest charge layer in the cloud (perhaps even below the base of the cloud) and the E field seems to be fairly constant varying between about -2 and -4 kV/m.  Can we use the charge density information at right in the figure to explain this field?

There are 4 layers of charge.  The field at Pt. X below the lowest layer will be a superposition of the fields from each of the layers above.   We'll assume each of the layers is of infinite horizontal extent.  We can use the integral form of Gauss' Law to determine the field above and below a layer of charge.


I think you can argue "by inspection" that the field above and below the infinite layer of charge will have just a z-component.  Also because the layer is of infinite extent the field strength will be the same at any distance above or below the layer.

So we compute ρ Δz for each of the layers, add the results together and use that to compute the field using the equation above.

Below the cloud we find that the field is negative (points downward) and has an amplitude of 3.4 kV/m.  This agrees very well with what is shown in the E field sounding.

Next we'll examine that E field change as the sensor passes through the lowest layer of charge.



We can measure the slope of the field change and the differential form of Gauss' Law to determine the volume space charge density.


Note that dE/dz is positive on the E field sounding between about 2.7 km and 4.5 km or so.  This coincides with a 1.8 km thick layer of positive space charge.  The slope turns negative between about 4.7 km and 5.1 km where there is a layer of negative charge.  The E field reaches a peak positive value at about 4.6 km, a point that is in between the layers of positive and negative charge.

We can determine the slope of the line highlighted in yellow and use that to determine the average volume space charge density in the layer of positive charge.


The value we obtain (0.27 nC/m3) is in good agreement with the 0.3 nC/m3 value given in the paper.