Thursday Jan. 21, 2010
click here to download today's notes in a more
printer friendly format.
Today's music featuring Amadou et Mariam
comes from a
student (in the MWF section)
recommendation:
You heard "Sabali", "Ce n'est Pas Bon," and part of "Beaux
Dimanches"
(if there's time)
Experiment #1 materials were handed out in
class on Tuesday, a few more sets were distributed today. If
you checked out materials you should find your name and more
information about the experiment on the Expt.
#1
Report
Signup
List.
We started by finishing up the secton on carbon monoxide.
Air temperature increases with increasing altitude in a temperature
inversion layer.
A very reasonable wintertime morning
temperature profile in Tucson is
shown at the top of p. 9 in the photocopied Classnotes.
Temperature increases from 47o
F at the
ground (Point A) to about 60o F at 1000 feet altitude (Point
B), that's the stable inversion layer. Temperature begins to
decrease with increasing altitude above Point B.
There is very little vertical
mixing in a stable air
layer.
When CO is emitted into the thin
stable layer (left figure
above), the CO
remains in the layer and doesn't mix with cleaner air above. CO
concentrations build. You'll find more information
about what makes the atmosphere stable or
unstable at the end of today's notes.
The concentrations of several of the main pollutants are monitored
in
large cities in the US and around the world. Six pollutants are
listed below (p. 8 in the photocopied ClassNotes). In Tucson,
carbon monoxide, ozone, and particulate matter are of primary concern
and daily measurements are reported in the city newspaper. The
Air Quality Index value is reported instead of the actual
concentration. The AQI is the ratio of the measured to accepted
concentrations multiplied by 100%. Air becomes unhealthy when the
AQI value exceeds 100%.
The atmospheric concentration of lead has decreased
significantly since the introduction of unleaded gasoline. PM
stands for particulate matter. These small particles are
invisible, remain suspended in the air, and may be made of harmful
materials. We'll talk about them in a little more detail next week.
For carbon monoxide,
concentrations up to 35 ppm (parts per million) for a 1 hour period and
9 ppm for an 8 hour period are allowed. If the observed CO
concentration were 4.5 ppm averaged over an 8 hour period the AQI would
be
AQI = 100% x (4.5ppm / 9ppm) = 50%
and the air quality would be considered good. Current Air Quality Index values for
Tucson
are
available
online.
So are we
have been talking about carbon monoxide found in
the atmosphere. Carbon monoxide is also a serious
hazard indoors where is can build to much higher levels than would ever
be found outdoors. You may remember having heard
about an incident at the beginning of the school year in 2007. Carbon
monoxide
from a malfunctioning hot water heater sickened 23 Virginia Tech
students in an apartment complex. The CO concentration is
thought to have reached 500 ppm. You can get an idea of what
kinds of health effects concentrations this high could cause from the
figure below (from p. 9 in the photocopied Classnotes).
To get an idea of what effects 500 pm CO
concentrations could cause, we will follow the 400 ppm line (shaded
orange) from left to right.
At
exposure times less than 1 hour you should experience no
symptoms. Beginning at 1 hour you might experience headache,
fatique, and dizziness. Exposures of a few hours will produce
throbbing headache, nausea, convulsions, and collapse. The 400
ppm trace level approaches the level where CO would cause coma and
death. At Virginia Tech several students were found unconscious
and one or two had stopped breathing but they were revived.
Carbon monoxide
alarms are relatively inexpensive and readily available at any hardware
store. They will monitor CO concentrations indoors and warn you
when
concentrations reach hazardous levels. Indoors CO is
produced by gas furnaces and water heaters that are
either operating improperly or aren't being adequately vented
to the outdoors. A few hundred people are killed indoors by
carbon
monoxide every
year in the United States. You can learn
more about carbon monoxide hazards and risk prevention at the Consumer Product
Safety Commission web page.
In the next few minutes of class we did a short
demonstration illustrating the scattering (splattering) of light.
Last week we were able to see a cloud when moist air came
into contact with liquid nitrogen. We will be making a smog cloud
in class later in class today. In both the case of the water
cloud and smog, being
able to see the cloud depends on the fact that the cloud
droplets scatter light. We would probably not be able to see the
clouds otherwise, the cloud droplets are just too small.
In the first part of the demonstration a narrow beam of intense
red
laser light was shined from one side of the classroom to the
other.
The students couldn't see the laser beam because the light rays
weren't pointing toward them. The instructor would have been able
to see the beam if he had
walked to the far wall and looked back along the beam of light (that
wouldn't have been a smart thing to do because the beam is strong
enough to damage his eyes).
Students were able to see a bright
red spot where the laser beam struck
the wall.
This is because when the intense beam of laser light
hits the wall it
is scattered (splattered is a more descriptive term). Weaker rays
of light are sent out in all directions. There is a ray of light
sent in the direction of every student in the class. They see the
light because they are looking back in the direction the ray came
from. It is safe to look at this light because the rays are
weaker than the initial beam.
Next we clapped some erasers together so that some small
particles of chalk dust fell into the laser beam.
Now instead of a single spot on the wall, students
saws lots of
points of light coming from different positions along the laser
beam. Each of these points of light was a particle of chalk, and
each piece of chalk dust was intercepting laser light and sending light
in all directions. Each student saw a ray of light coming from
each of the chalk particles.
We use chalk because it is white, it will scatter rather
than absorb visible light. What would you have seen if black
particles
of soot had been dropped into the laser beam?
In the last part of the demonstration we made a cloud by
pouring some
liquid nitrogen into a cup of water. The numerous little water
droplets made very good scatterers.
The laser light really lit up and
turned the small patches of
cloud
red. The cloud did a very good job of scattering laser light. So
much light was scattered
that the spot on the wall fluctuated in intensity (the spot dimmed when
lots of
light was being scattered, and brightened when not as much light was
scattered).
A comment not mentioned in
class. Air molecules are able
to scatter light too, just like cloud droplets. Air molecules are
much smaller than cloud droplets and don't scatter much light.
That's why you weren't able to see light being scattered by air before
we
put chalk particles or cloud droplets into the beam. Outdoors you
are able to see sunlight (much more intense than the laser beam used in
the class demonstration) scattered by air molecules. Sunlight is
white and is made up of violet, blue, green, yellow, orange, and red
light. Air molecules have an unusual property: they scatter the
shorter wavelengths (violet, blue, green) much more readily than the
longer wavelength colors in sunlight (yellow, orange, and red).
When you look away from the sun and look at the sky, the blue color
that you see are the shorter wavelengths in sunlight that are being
scattered by air molecules. We'll come back to this again in a
week or two when we cover particulate matter.
We discussed another gaseous
pollutant today, tropospheric ozone.
Ozone has a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
personality (The Jeckyl and Hide reference was added after
class). Ozone
in
the stratosphere (the ozone layer) is beneficial, it absorbs dangerous
high
energy ultraviolet light (which would otherwise reach the ground and
cause skin cancer, cataracts, and many other problems).
Ozone in the troposphere is bad, it is a
pollutant.
That is the stuff we will be concerned with today. Tropospheric
ozone is also a key component of photochemical smog (also known as Los
Angeles-type smog)
We'll be making some photochemical smog as a
class
demonstration. This will require ozone (and a hydrocarbon of some
kind). We'll use the simple stratospheric recipe for making
ozone in the demonstration rather than the more complex tropospheric
process (4-step process shown below).
At the top of this figure you see that a more complex
series
of
reactions is responsible for the production of tropospheric
ozone. The production of tropospheric
ozone begins with nitric
oxide
(NO). NO is produced when nitrogen and oxygen in air are heated
(in an
automobile engine for example) and react. The NO can then react
with oxygen to make nitrogen dioxide, the poisonous brown-colored
gas we made in class. Sunlight can dissociate (split)
the nitrogen dioxide
molecule producing atomic oxygen (O) and NO. O and O2
react in a 4th step to make ozone (O3).
Because ozone
does not come directly from an automobile tailpipe or factory chimney,
but only shows up after a series of reactions, it is a secondary
pollutant. Nitric oxide would be the primary pollutant in
this example.
NO is produced early in the day (during the morning rush
hour).
The concentration of NO2
peaks
somewhat later. Peak ozone concentrations are usually found in
the afternoon. Ozone concentrations are also usually higher in
the summer than in the winter. This is because sunlight plays a
role in ozone production and summer sunlight is more intense than
winter sunlight.
As shown in the figure below,
invisible ozone can react with a hydrocarbon of some kind which is also
invisible to make a
product
gas. This product gas sometimes condenses to make a visible smog
cloud or haze. The cloud is composed of very small droplets or
solid particles. They're too small to be seen but they are able
to scatter light - that's why you can see the cloud.
The class demonstration of
photochemical smog is summarized
below (a flask was used instead of the aquarium shown on the bottom of
p. 16 in the photocopied class notes). We begin by using the UV
lamp to create and fill the flask with
ozone. Then a few pieces of fresh lemon peel were added to the
flask. A whitish cloud quickly became visible (colored brown in
the figure below).
We
finished the material above a little earlier than planned so I added
some information about stratospheric ozone and the ozone layer (found
on pps 17-18 in the photocopied ClassNotes).
The
top
two
equations show how ozone is produced in the stratosphere.
Ultraviolet (UV) light splits an O2 molecule into two O atoms.
One of these reacts with O2 to make O3 (ozone).
Ozone is destroyed when it absorbes UV light and is split into O and O2
(the two pieces move away from each other and don't recombine to make
ozone). O3 is also destroyed when it reacts with an oxygen
atom. Two atoms of oxygen reacting to make O2 reduce the amount
of one of the raw materials needed to make O3 and thereby reduce the
concentration of ozone in the ozone layer.
The bottom figure attempts to show that the ozone concentration in the
stratosphere will change until the rates of production and destruction
balance each other (analogous to your bank account not changing when
the amount of money deposition and withdrawn are equal).
Knowing that you need O2 and UV light to make ozone, you can begin
to understand why the ozone layer is found not too high, not too low,
but rather in the middle of the atmosphere.
There is plenty of UV light high in the atmosphere but not much
oxygen (air gets thinner at higher and higher altitude). Near the
ground there is plenty of oxygen but not as much UV light (it is
absorbed by gases above the ground). You find the optimal amounts
of UV light and oxygen somewhere in between, near 25 km altitude.
This next figure lists some of the problems associated with
exposure to UV light. Thinning of the ozone layer will result in
increased amounts of UV light reaching the ground. This wasn't
discussed in class.
Skin cancer and cataracts are probably the best known hazards
associated with UV light. At some point in the next week or two
we'll look at how man may be damaging the ozone layer by introducing
chemical compounds into the atmosphere that react with and destroy
stratospheric ozone. Here's
something
else
that we
didn't cover in class (it might well have caused the students to
rise up in revolt)
I have a bad habit of "beating some concepts to
death."
Here's an example. The rather
busy and confusing picture below (p. 10 in the photocopied ClassNotes)
just illustrates how small
changes in how
air temperature changes with increasing altitude can determine whether
the atmosphere will be stable or unstable. Just for
the
purposes of illustration imagine riding a bicycle north from Swan and
River Rd up the hill to Swan and Sunrise (fhe figure shows an elevation
change of 1000 ft, it is actually quite a bit less than that).
At far left the air temperature goes from 47o F to 41o
F, a drop of 6o
F. This is a
fairly
rapid rate of decrease with increasing altitude and would make the
atmosphere
absolutely unstable.
The
atmosphere
wouldn't
remain
this
way.
Air at the ground would rise, air higher up would sink, and
the
temperature profile would change. In some ways it would be like
trying to pour vinegar on top of oil in a glass. The lower
density oil would rise because it would "want" to float on top of the
higher density vinegar.
The next picture shows air temperature decreasing a little more slowly
with increasing altitude. This small change makes the atmosphere
conditionally unstable
(we won't go into what the conditions might
be). The
atmosphere is frequently in this state.
The atmosphere cools only 2o F in 1000 feet in the next
picture.
This creates
an absolutely stable
atmosphere. Air at the ground will remain at
the ground and won't rise and mix with air higher up. Compare
this with the glass containing vinegar and a layer of oil on top.
The two layers won't mix.
Air temperature in the last figure actually increases with increasing
altitude. This is a temperature
inversion and is very common on
winter mornings. The atmosphere is extremely stable under
these conditions.
Temperature inversions are something you can check out for yourself
this time of the year. Head north on Swan
Rd. on your bicycle early some winter morning. You will pass
through
some pretty cold air as
you cross the Rillito River. By the time you get to Sunrise, the
air can be 10 to 15 degrees warmer and will seem balmy compared to the
cold
air at the bottom of the hill. If you're up for a real
hill-climbing challenge
continue north on Swan past Skyline. You'll find a short but very
steep section of road at the far north end of Swan.
As long as we're talking about bicycles and hills here's a picture
of my bicycle. I was in France last summer trying to ride up some
of the famous Tour de France mountain stages in the Alps. One of
the most famous is the Alpe d'Huez. That's my bicycle, a green
"Gilmour" (Andy Gilmour is a local bicycle builder) at the top of the
Alpe d'Huez.